310-319-6188

Attorneys At Law, Representing Employees in Civil Rights and Employment Litigation

top left g  w bkgd

Justice For Employees Is Our Business, Our Only Business

Greenberg & Weinmann has successfully represented California employees for over 25 years. In the process, we have provided guidance thoughtfully and obtained justice with steely resolve.

Welcome

Greenberg & Weinmann has aggressively pursued and obtained justice and dignity on behalf of employees since our first trial victory on behalf of a mistreated employee in Los Angeles Superior Court over 25 years ago.

We have achieved numerous six- and seven-figure results on behalf of our clients.

We pledge our loyalty and undivided attention to our clients.

If you are uncertain whether you have a case, please read our FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions). If you'd like to consult with us, please call us at 310-319-6188 or fill out our "Ready to Talk?" form.

super lawyers MDAtop left g  w bkgd

An Alternative to Defamation: False Light Invasion of Privacy

Here are some examples of what courts have held to constitute false light publications:

  •  In M.G. v. Time Warner, Inc. (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 623, stories about the coach of an athletic team who was convicted of child molestation also included a photograph of a Little League team that the child molester had coached. The Court of Appeal held that the individuals in the photograph who were not molested by the coach may be able to prove a false light claim because “the article and the program could reasonably be interpreted as reporting that some or all the players in the photograph had been molested,” which was a false implication. Id. at 636.
  •  In Solano v. Playgirl Magazine (9 th Cir. 2002) 292 F.3d 1078, the plaintiff celebrity was featured on the cover of Playgirl Magazine, which typically contained sexually suggestive nude pictures of men. The 9 th Circuit held that the cover, which featured the celebrity’s bare-chest photograph and various suggestive headlines, would falsely imply that he voluntarily posed for and appeared nude inside the magazine.
  •  In Gill v. Curtis Publishing Co. (1952) 38 Cal.2d 273, the Ladies Home Journal published an article condemning “love at first sight” as being based on nothing more than sexual attraction. The author said such love was “wrong” and would lead to divorce. The article featured a photo of a couple, with the caption, “[p]ublicized as glamorous, desirable, ‘love at first sight’ is a bad risk.” Although the journal did not actually say the couple was engaged in the “wrong” kind of love, the couple, who did not know that their picture had been taken, prevailed by proving the magazine created a false impression that the couple was behaving wrongly in love.

This is not an exhaustive list but simply illustrative of what some courts have considered to befalse light publications. Claims for false light invasion of privacy are not mutually exclusive.Depending on the circumstances, you may be entitled to recover damages for the harms caused by both.

Leave your comments

Post comment as a guest

0
Your comments are subjected to administrator's moderation.
terms and condition.
  • No comments found
linkedin on facebook on twitter on youtube on

 

 

ready to talk 750

The information contained above is intended for purely informational purposes.
It does not in any way constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. 
Use of such material does not, in any way, constitute an attorney-client relationship; only an express signed agreement can create such a relationship.

Practice Areas    |   Our Attorneys   |   FAQ   |  California Employees Defamation Blog  |  Ready to Talk?  

1101 Montana Ave., Suite D, Santa Monica, CA 90403

© 2014 Greenberg & Weinmann - All Rights Reserved
website build | designwebolution9